The applicability of public-private partnership contracts for infrastructure projects as a function of their specificity
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu05.2020.403Abstract
The Crimean bridge, as Russia’s largest infrastructure project, can be considered a marginal case of the relative effectiveness of public financing without the involvement of private partners. According to the formalization employed, the implementation of this project through market coordination leads to additional costs due to the rising level of specificity. The increase in these costs is not linear and is more intensive than growth in the level of specificity. Introduction of an NPV-efficiency assessment tool into the analysis allows us to prove a limiting reduction of this interval for considering the risk profile of the project under сonsideration. Reserves required due to the risk of rising budget expenditures due to the project’s scale actually does not exist according to these reasons: increases in the discount rate is more intensive
than the rise of negative expectations; the rise of additional equity premiums is more intensive than the rise of the risk-free rate itself. Thus, the Crimean bridge project should be considered a marginal case of the relative effectiveness of direct state funding comparing PPP scheme.
Keywords:
large-scale project, public-private partnership, transaction costs, institutional analysis, contracts’ design, the Crimean Bridge.
Downloads
References
Литература:
Аюржанаева Д. З. (2015) Институциональное развитие системы государственно-частного партнерства. Науковедение. Т. 7, № 3. URL: http://naukovedenie.ru/PDF/94EVN315.pdf (дата обращения:12.03.2019).
Богуцкая О. А. (2014) Трансакционный подход в управлении стоимостью заемного капитала предприятия. В сб.: XII всероссийское совещание по проблемам управления. Институт проблем управления им. В. А. Трапезникова РАН. С. 4828–4838.
Вольчик В. В., Нечаев А. Д. (2015) Трансакционный анализ сферы государственных закупок. Ростов на-Дону: Изд-во «Содействие — ХХI век». 142 с.
Дабагян Е. К. (2015) Развитие государственно-частного партнёрства в Российской Федерации. Росийское предпринимательство. Т. 16, № 4. С. 611 622.
Калина А. В. (2004) Анализ существующих проблем развития государственно-частного партнерства в России и разработка рекомендаций по их решению. Современные проблемы науки и образования. № 6. С. 417.
Капогузов Е. А., Быкова К. Г. (2014) Государственно-частное партнерство как объект институционального анализа: к вопросу о систематизации формальных институтов. Журнал институциональных исследований. Т. 6, № 3. С. 132–145.
Козлова С. В. (2009) Институциональная среда развития государственно-частного партнерства в России. Экономика и политика. Т. 58, № 9. С. 27–30.
Кулыгин В. В., Месропян К. Э., Патракеева О. Ю. (2013) Методика оценки крупномасштабных инвестиционных проектов межрегионального характера. Региональная экономика: теория и практика. № 22. С. 8–18.
Мерзлов И. Ю. (2014) Подходы к структурированию проектов государственно-частного партнерства. Journal of Economic Regulation. Т. 5, № 1. С. 77 87.
Никонова И. А. (2012) Проектный анализ и проектное финансирование. М.: Альпина Паблишер.154 с.
Уильямсон О. И. (2009) Теория фирмы как организационной структуры: от теории выбора к теории контрактов. Экономическая политика. № 6. С. 111–134.
Фливбьорг Б., Брузелиус Н., Ротенгаттер В. (2014) Мегапроекты и риски: Анатомия амбиций. М.:Альпина Паблишер. 288 с.
Черемная Т. С. (2015) Государственно-частное партнерство в странах БРИКС: опыт и перспективы реализации. Вестник МГИМО. № 5 (44). С. 190 -197.
Bank ability in Highway PPP Projects. World Bank Open Overview. URL: https://ppiaf.org/documents/3181/download (дата обращения: 25.01.2019).
Estrada J. (2013) The enhanced risk premium factor model and expected returns. Journal of Investment Strategies, vol. 2, no. 3, рр. 3–21.
Hodge G. A., Greve C. (2007) Public–Private Partnerships: An International Performance Review. Public Administration Review, vol. 67, no. 3, рр. 545–558.
The World Bank. Doing Business. Measuring Business Regulations. URL: https://www.doingbusiness.org/ (дата обращения: 25.01.2019).
Trading Economis. URL: https://ru.tradingeconomics.com/country-list/interest-rate (дата обращения:25.01.2019).
Verougstraete M. (2017) Bankability of PPP Projects. National Workshops on Infrastructure Financing Strategies for Sustainable Development in Samoa. URL: http://www.unescap.org/sites/default/files/Session%204%20-%20Finance%20-%20PPP%20Bankability%20-%20UNESCAP_0.pdf (дата обращения:28.01.2019).
References:
Ayurzhanaeva D. Z. (2015) Institutional development of public-private partnerships. Naukovedenie, vol. 7,no. 3. URL:http://naukovedenie.ru/PDF/94EVN315.pdf (accessed: 12.03.2019). (In Russian)
Bogutskaya O. A. (2014) Transactional approach to managing of enterprise’s debt capital. XII vserossiyskoe soveshchanie po problemam upravleniia, pp. 4828–4838. (In Russian)
Volchik V. V., Nechaev A. D. (2015) Transaction analysis of public procurement. Rostov-on-Don, Sodejstvie— ХХI Publ. 142 p. (In Russian)
Dabagyan E. K. (2015) The development of public-private partnership in Russian Federation. Rossiiskoe predprinimatelstvo, vol. 16, no. 4, pp. 611 622. (In Russian)
Kalina A. V. (2004) Analysis of existing problems of state-private partnership development in Russia and recommendations for solution. Sovremennye problemy nauki i obrazovaniia, no. 6, p. 417. (In Russian)
Kapoguzov E. A., Bykova K. G. (2014) Public-private partnership as a subject of institutional analysis: to the problem of formal institutions systematization. Zhurnal institutsional’nykh issledovanii, vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 132–145. (In Russian)
Kozlova S. V. (2009) The institutional environment of public-private partnership development in Russia. Ekonomika i politika, vol. 58, no. 9, pp. 27 30. (In Russian)
Kulygin V. V., Mesropyan K. E., Patrakeeva O. Yu. (2013) The methodology for evaluation of interregional large investment projects. Regional’naia ekonomika: teoriia i praktika, no. 22, pp. 8–18. (In Russian)
Merzlov I. Yu. (2014) Approaches to structuring of public-private partnership. Journal of Economic Regulation, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 77–87. (In Russian)
Nikonova I. A. (2012) Project analysis and project financing. Moscow, Alpina Publ. 154 p. (In Russian)
Williamson O. E. (2009) The Theory of the Firm as Governance Structure: From Choice to Contract. Ekonomicheskaia Politika, no. 6, pp. 111–134. (In Russian)
Flyvbjerg B., Bruzelius N., Rothengatter W. (2014) Megaprojects and Risk: An Anatomy of Ambition. Moscow, Alpina Publ. 288 p. (In Russian)
Cheremnaya T. S. (2015) Public-private partnership in the BRICS countries: experience and prospects for implementation. Vestnik MGIMO, no. 5 (44), pp. 190–197. (In Russian).
Bankability in Highway PPP Projects. World Bank Open Overview. URL: https://ppiaf.org/documents/3181/download (accessed: 25.01.2019).
Estrada J. (2013) The enhanced risk premium factor model and expected returns. Journal of Investment Strategies, vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 3–21.
Hodge G. A., Greve C. (2007) Public–Private Partnerships: An International Performance Review. Public Administration Review, vol. 67, no 3, pp. 545–558.
The World Bank. Doing Business. Measuring Business Regulations. URL: https://www.doingbusiness.org/ (accessed:25.01.2019).
Trading Economis. URL: https://ru.tradingeconomics.com/country-list/interest-rate (дата обращения:25.01.2019)
Verougstraete M. (2017) Bankability of PPP Projects. National Workshops on Infrastructure Financing Strategies for Sustainable Development in Samoa. URL: http://www.unescap.org/sites/default/files/Session%204%20-%20Finance%20-%20PPP%20Bankability%20-%20UNESCAP_0.pdf (accessed: 28.01.2019).
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Articles of the St Petersburg University Journal of Economic Studies are open access distributed under the terms of the License Agreement with Saint Petersburg State University, which permits to the authors unrestricted distribution and self-archiving free of charge.
