Куда идет история экономических учений: медленно двигается в никуда?
Аннотация
The paper argues that economics science is not a perfect selection mechanism that preserves each and every economic idea that is valid and useful and jettisons all ideas that are not. Therefore the task of the history of economic thought cannot be limited to the study of the past from the present state of economics. Another important task is to study the present state of economics from the standpoint of past authors in order to see what has been gained and what lost in the course of time. The history of economic thought may play a useful role by preserving valuable ideas which otherwise would fall into oblivion.
Ключевые слова:
история экономической мысли×
Скачивания
Данные скачивания пока недоступны.
Библиографические ссылки
Литература на русском языке
Кейнс Дж. М. Общая теория занятости, процента и денег // Антология экономической классики: В 2 т. Т. 2. М., 1992.
Смит А. Исследование о природе и причинах богатства народов // Антология экономической классики. М., 1993
References in Latin Alphabet
Aghion, P. and Howitt, P. (1998). Endogenous Growth Theory. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Arrow, K. (1969). Classificatory notes on the production and transmission of technological knowledge. American Economic Review. Papers and Proceedings, 59: 29–35.
Audi, R. (1998). Epistemology. A Contemporary Introduction to the Theory of Knowledge, 2nd edition. New York and London: Routledge.
Blaug, M. (ed.) (1991). The Historiography of Economics. Aldershot: Edward Elgar.
Blaug, M. (1997). Economic Theory in Retrospect, 5th edition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Blaug, M. (2001). No history of ideas please, we're economists. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 15: 145–164.
Boehm, S., Gehrke, C., Kurz, H. D. and Sturn, R (eds) (2002). Is There Progress in Economics? Knowledge, Truth and the History of Economic Thought. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
Boulding, K.E. (1956). The Image. Knowledge in Life and Society. Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press.
Boulding, K.E. — (1971). After Samuelson who needs Adam Smith? History of Political Economy, 3: 225–237.
Cesarano, F. (1983). On the role of the history of economic analysis. History of Political Economy, 15(1). Переиздана в: Blaug (1991).
Dixit, A. and Stiglitz, J. (1977). Monopolistic competition and optimum product diversity. American Economic Review, 67: 297–308.
Felipe, J. and McCombie, J.S.L. (2005). Why are some countries richer than others? A skeptical view of Mankiw Romer Weil's test of the neoclassical growth model. Metroeconomica, 56: 360–392.
Friedman, M. (1953). On the methodology of positive economics. In M. Friedman, Essays in Positive Economics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Garegnani, P. (2005). On a turning point in Sraffa's theoretical and interpretative position in the late 1920s. European Journal of the History of Economic Thought, 12(3): 453–492.
Gehrke, C. and Kurz, H. D. (2006). Sraffa on von Bortkiewicz: reconstructing the classical theory of value and distribution. History of Political Economy, 38(1): 91–149.
Goethe, J. W. von (1953). Schriften zur Kunst, Schriften zur Literatur, vol. 12 of the Hamburg Edition. Hamburg: Christian Wegner.
Gordon, D. F. (1965). The role of the history of economic thought in understanding modern economic theory. American Economic Review, 55: 119–127. Переиздана в: Blaug (1991).
Hayek, F. A. von (1937). Economics and knowledge. Economica, new series, IV: 33–54.
Henderson, H. (2005). Prix Nobel d'Économie: 1'imposture. Le Monde diplomatique, February.
Keynes, J. M. (1936). The General Theory of Employment, Interest and Money, vol. VII of The Collected Writings of John Maynard Keynes, ed. A. Robinson and D. Moggridge. London: Macmillan.
Keynes, J. M. (1970). The Collected Writings of John Maynard Keynes , vol. IX, ed. A. Robinson and D. Moggridge. London: Macmillan.
Krugman, P. (1995). Development, Geography, and Economic Theory. Cambridge, MA, and London: MIT Press.
Kurz, H. D. (ed.) (2000). Critical Essays on Piero Sraffa's Legacy in Economics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Kurz, H. D. (ed.) (2005a). The agents of production are the commodities themselves: on the classical theory of production, distribution and value. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 17(1): 1–26.
Kurz, H. D. (ed.) (2005b). Joseph A. Schumpeter – Sozialokönom zwischen Marx und Walras. Marburg: Metropolis.
Kurz, H. D. (ed.) and Salvadori, N. (2004). 'Man from the Moon': on Sraffa's objectivism. Economies et Societes, 35: 1545–1557.
Kurz, H. D. (ed.) (2005). Representing the production and circulation of commodities in material terms: on Sraffa's objectivism. Review of Political Economy, 17(3): 413–441.
Lapidus, A. (1996). Introduction а une Histoire de la Pensée Economique qui ne verra jamais le jour. Revue économique, 47(4): 867–892.
Lawson, T. (1997). Economics and Reality. London: Routledge.
Lucas, R. E. (1988). On the mechanics of economic development. Journal of Monetary Economics, 22: 3–42.
Lucas, R. E. (2002). Lectures on Economic Growth. Cambridge, MA and London: Harvard University Press.
Machlup, F. (1980). Knowledge and Knowledge Production. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Mankiw, G., Romer, D. and Weil, D. (1992). A contribution to the empirics of economic growth. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 107: 407–437.
Nagel, T. (1986). The View from Nowhere. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press.
Park, M. (2006). Homogeneity masquerading as variety: the case of horizontal innovation models. Cambridge Journal of Economics (forthcoming).
Pigou, A. C. (1920). The Economics of Welfare. London: Macmillan.
Prigogine, I. (2005). The rediscovery of value and the opening of economics. In K. Dopfer (ed.), The Evolutionary Foundations of Economics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 61–69.
Ricardo, D. (1951–73). The Works and Correspondence of David Ricardo, 11 vols, ed. Piero Sraffa with the collaboration of Maurice H. Dobb. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Robbins, L. (1978). The Theory of Economic Policy in English Classical Political Economy, 2nd edition. London: Macmillan.
Romer, P. M. (1986). Increasing returns and long run growth. Journal of Political Economy, 94: 1002–1037.
Romer, P. M. (1990). Endogenous technological change. Journal of Political Economy, 98: S71–S102.
Romer, P. M. (1994). The origins of endogenous growth. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 8: 3–22.
Romer, P. M. (1996). Why, indeed, in America? Theory, history, and the origins of modern economic growth. American Economic Review. Papers and Proceedings, 86: 202–206.
Romer, P. M. (2005). Interview with Paul M. Romer. In B. Snowdon and H.R. Vane, Modern Macroeconomics. Its Origins, Development and Current State. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, pp. 673–694.
Ruse, M. (1988). Molecules to men: evolutionary biology and thoughts of progress. In M.H.H. Nitecki (ed.), Evolutionary Progress. Chicago, IL: Chicago University Press.
Samuelson, P. A. (1962). Economists and the history of ideas. American Economic Review, 52: 1–18.
Samuelson, P. A. (1978). The canonical classical model of political economy. Journal of Economic Literature, 16: 1415–1434.
Samuelson, P. A. (1987). Out of the closet: a program for the Whig history of economic science. History of Economics Society Bulletin, 9: 51–60.
Say, J. B. (1840). Cours complet d' économie potitique pratique, 2nd edition, vol. 2. Paris: Guillaumin.
Schumpeter, J. A. (1908). Das Wesen und der Hauptinhalt der theoretischen Nationalökonomie. Leipzig: Duncker and Humblot.
Schumpeter, J. A (1934). The Theory of Economic Development. An Inquiry into Profits, Capital, Credit, Interest, and the Business Cycle. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Reprint (1983) Transaction, Inc.
Schumpeter, J. A (1954). History of Economic Analysis. London: Allen and Unwin.
Smith, A. (1976). An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations, two vols. In The Glasgow Edition of the Works and Correspondence of Adam Smith, ed. R. H. Campbell and A. S. Skinner. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Sraffa, P. (1960). Production of Commodities by Means of Commodities. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Steedman, I. (2003). On 'measuring' knowledge in new (endogenous) growth theory. In N. Salvadori (ed.), Old and New Growth Theories: An Assessment. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, pp. 127–133.
Weitzman, M. (1998). Recombinant growth. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 113: 331–360.
Whitehead, A. N. (1926). Science and the Modern World, Lowell Lectures 1925. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Winch, D. (1962). What price the history of economic thought. Scottish Journal of Political Economy, 9(1): 193–204.
Winch, D. (1997). Adam Smith's problems and ours. Scottish Journal of Political Economy, 44(4): 384–402.
Winch, D. (2000). 'Does progress matter?' European Journal of the History of Economic Thought, 7(4): 465–484.
Translation of references in Russian into English
Загрузки
Опубликован
30.09.2008
Как цитировать
Курц, Х. Д. (2008). Куда идет история экономических учений: медленно двигается в никуда?. Вестник Санкт-Петербургского университета. Экономика, (3), 003–025. извлечено от https://economicsjournal.spbu.ru/article/view/4014
Выпуск
Раздел
Методология экономической науки
Лицензия
Статьи журнала «Вестник Санкт-Петербургского университета. Экономика» находятся в открытом доступе и распространяются в соответствии с условиями Лицензионного Договора с Санкт-Петербургским государственным университетом, который бесплатно предоставляет авторам неограниченное распространение и самостоятельное архивирование.
