The impact of the ownership structure on the innovative activity of Russian companies
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu05.2021.403Abstract
Capital structure determines a company’s growth prospects by affecting its investment activity. The article examines what type of capital, foreign or state-owned, stimulates a company’s innovative activity as measured by its number of patent applications. The study was carried out using data from 238 public Russian companies in the period 2012–2020. The results of the study show that state and foreign investors influence innovation to different degrees: state capital positively affects the number of patent applications filed, while foreign capital does not. The impact of political connections and board structure on research and development was investigated. The political ties of the CEOs and the board chairs are expressed by the experience of working in the public service. The presence of such experience in the company’s management increases the company’s innovation activity. However, political connections are effective only in companies with state capital, or in specific industries. The company’s state capital and political connections have a positive impact on the number of patent applications filed in the energy and industrial sectors. The presence of political ties has a positive impact on the role of foreign capital in innovation. The share of foreign directors has a positive effect on patents. Also, the presence of patents from previous years, as well as the age and size of the company, affects the receipt of patents in the future. The younger and larger the company, the more patent applications there will be.
Keywords:
R&D, innovations, patents, foreign investment, government ownership, political ties
Downloads
References
References
Bena J., Ferreira M., Matos P., Pires P. (2015) Are foreign investors locusts? The long-term effects of foreign institutional ownership. Journal of Financial Economics, no. 126, pp. 122–146.
Bilderbeek J. (1999) R&D performance measurement: More than choosing a set of metrics. R&D Management, no. 29, pp. 35–46.
Blundell R., Bond S. (1998) Initial Conditions and Moment Restrictions in Dynamic Panel Data Models. Journal of Econometrics, no. 87, pp. 115–143.
Bremser W. G., Barsky N. P. (2004) Utilizing the balanced scorecard for R&D performance measurement. R&D Management, no. 34, pp. 229–238.
Cherkasova V., Ivanova A. (2019) Do political connections influence investment efficiency in Russian companies? Journal of Corporate Finance Research, vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 36–49.
Choi S. B., Williams C. (2011) Ownership and firm innovation in a transition economy: evidence from China. Research Policy, no. 40, pp. 441–452.
Corsi C., Prencipe A. (2017) Foreign ownership and innovation in independent SMEs. A cross-european analysis. Journal of Small Business & Entrepreneurship, no. 30, pp. 397–430.
Driscoll J., Kraay A. (1998) Consistent Covariance Matrix Estimation With Spatially Dependent Panel Data, The Review of Economics and Statistics, no. 80, pp. 549–560.
Fernhaber S. A., Mcdougall-Covin P. P. (2009) Venture capitalists as catalysts to new venture internationalization: the impact of their knowledge and reputation resources. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, no. 33, pp. 277–295.
Fritsch M., Schilder D. (2008) Does venture capital investment really require spatial proximity? An empirical investigation. Environment and Planning, no. 40, pp. 2114–2131.
Guadalupe M., Thomas C. (2012) Innovation and foreign ownership. American Economic Review, no. 102, pp. 3594–3627.
Hall B. H., Griliches Z., Hausman J. A. (1984) Patents and R&D: is There a Lag? Working paper, no. 1454. URL: https://www.nber.org/papers/w1454 (accessed: 20.02.2021).
Hintošovaа A. B., Kubíkova Z. (2016) The effect of the degree of foreign ownership on firms’ performance. Review of Economic Perspectives, no. 16, pp. 29–43.
Khachoo Q. and Sharma R. (2015). FDI and incumbent R&D behavior: Evidence from Indian manufacturing sector. Journal of Economic Studies, no. 44, pp. 380–399.
Kim B., Oh H. (2002) Economic compensation compositions preferred by R&D personnel of different R&D types and intrinsic values. R&D Management, no. 32, pp. 47–59.
Kong D., Zhu L., Yang Z. (2020) Effects of foreign investors on energy firms’ innovation: Evidence from a natural experiment in China. Energy Economics, no. 92, pp. 1–7.
Kwon H. U., Park J. (2018) R&D, Foreign ownership, and corporate groups: Evidence from Japanese firms. Research Policy, no. 47, pp. 428–439.
Li M., Taihua Y, Chen H. (2021) Venture capital and internationalization of enterprise R&D — A study of China’s GEM listed companies. Science Research Management, no. 42, pp. 1–8.
Lu X. (2020) The explanatory power of R&D for the stock returns in the Chinese equity market. Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, no. 62, pp. 1–20.
Love J., Roper S. (1999) The Determinants of Innovation: R & D, Technology Transfer and Networking Effects. Review of Industrial Organization, no. 15, pp. 43–64.
Makela M. M., Maula M. V. (2005) Cross-border venture capital and new venture inter-nationalization: An isomorphism perspective. Venture Capital, no. 7, pp. 227–257.
Makela M. M., Maula M. V. (2006) Inter-organizational commitment in syndicated cross-border venture capital investments. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, no. 30, pp. 273–298.
Mansfield E. (1984) R&D and Innovation: Some Empirical Findings. National Bureau of Economic Research, no. 1, pp. 127–154.
Nagaraj P. (2016) Firm ownership and R&D expenditure — evidence from India. Journal of International Business and Economics, no. 16, pp. 17–26.
Qiao Z., Li Z. (2019) Do foreign institutional investors enhance firm innovation in China. Applied Economics Letters, no. 26, pp. 1125–1128.
Que J., Zhang X. (2020) The role of foreign and domestic venture capital in innovation: Evidence from China. Accounting & Finance, no. 60, pp. 1077 1110.
Rahul K., Parthiban D. (1996) Institutional investors and firm innovation: A test of competing hypotheses. Strategic Management Journal, no. 17, pp. 73 84.
Shin I., Park S. (2020) Role of foreign and domestic institutional investors in corporate sustainability: Focusing on R&D investment. Susainability, vol. 12, no. 20, pp. 1–13.
Sorenson O., Stuart T. E. (2001) Syndication networks and the spatial distribution of venture capital investments. American Journal of Sociology, no. 106, pp. 1546–1588.
Tan J., Xia J. (2008) Managing risk in a transitional environment: an exploratory study of control and incentive mechanisms of venture capital firms in China. Journal of Small Business Management, no. 46, pp. 263–285.
Teng D., Yi J. (2017) Impact of ownership types on R&D intensity and innovation performance — evidence from transitional China. Frontiers of Business Research in China, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 1–25.
Tihanyi L., Arguilera R., Heugens P., van Essen M., Sauerwald S., Duran P., Turturea R. (2019) State Ownership and Political Connections. Journal of Management, no. 45, pp. 2293–2321.
Tu Y. H., Zhao X. Q. (2012) Technology spillovers of FDI in ASEAN sourcing from local and abroad. China Finance Review International, no. 2, pp. 78–94.
Wang D., Sutherland D., Ning L., Wang Y., Pan X. (2018) Exploring the influence of political connections and managerial overconfidence on R&D intensity in China’s large-scale private sector firms. Technovation, no. 69, pp. 40–53.
Wu B., Liang H., Shen Y. (2018) Political connection, ownership, and post-crisis industrial upgrading investment: Evidence from China. Emerging Markets Finance & Trade, no. 54, pp. 2651–2668.
Xiaowu Lu (2020) The Explanatory Power of R&D for the Stock Returns in the Chinese Equity Market. Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, no. 62, p. 101380.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Articles of the St Petersburg University Journal of Economic Studies are open access distributed under the terms of the License Agreement with Saint Petersburg State University, which permits to the authors unrestricted distribution and self-archiving free of charge.
