Премия за размер: анализ российского рынка капитала

Софья Анатольевна Фомкина

doi:10.21638/11701/spbu05.2016.405

Authors

Софья Анатольевна Фомкина National Research University Higher School of Economics, 20, Myasnitskaya Ulitsa, Moscow, 101000, Russian Federation https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0461-6553

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21638/11701/spbu05.2016.405

Abstract

Now there is a common practice in many Russian and foreign companies to include in asset pricing models a premium for small capitalization (size premium). As a rule, companies employing this approach (including Russian companies) use premiums of such reports as Ibbotson SBBI Classic Yearbook or Duff & Phelps Risk Premium Report. However, the information (size premiums) presented in these reports is prepared on the basis of the U. S. capital market, and, respectively, it is necessary to adjust this data when the cost of equity is evaluated for companies operating in other capital markets.
In addition, published studies devoted to the study of size eff ect, in both developed and emerging capital markets, oft en have opposing conclusions about the presence of this eff ect and its magnitude. For this reason we have questions about the validity of the calculated cost of equity using the size premium.
The article presents the results of the study of the size premium and cost of equity conducted in the laboratory of the Corporate Finance Center (NRU HSE) in conjunction with PwC. Based on the dataset including stock returns of 101 non-fi nancial companies listed on the Moscow Interbank Currency Exchange and covering the period from 2006 to 2014, we observed that the size premium is typical for Russian medium-sized companies. At the same time, the size premium for small companies was negative. Th e results obtained in this study have a practical value for management of Russian companies and funds. Refs 36. Fig. 1. Tables 2.

Keywords:

size effect, size premium, Fama-French model, cost of equity, capital asset pricing model (CAPM), emerging capital markets

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Софья Анатольевна Фомкина, National Research University Higher School of Economics, 20, Myasnitskaya Ulitsa, Moscow, 101000, Russian Federation

Junior researcher, Corporate Finance Center

References

Литература на русском языке

References in Latin Alphabet

Translation of references in Russian into English

Ivashkovskaia I. V., Grigor’eva S. A., Kokoreva M. S., Stepanova A. N. et al. Korporativnye finansovye resheniia. Empiricheskii analiz rossiiskikh kompanii (korporativnye finansovye resheniia na razvivaiushchikhsia rynkakh kapitala) [Corporate financial decisions. An empirical analysis of Russian companies (corporate financial decisions in emerging capital markets)]. Ed. by I. V. Ivashkovskaia. Moscow, INFRA-M Publ., 2012. 281 p. (In Russian)

Amihud Y. Illiquidity and stock returns: cross-section and time-series effects. Journal of Financial Markets, 2002, vol. 5, pp. 31–56.

Amihud Y., Mendelson H. Asset pricing and the bid-ask spread. Journal of Financial Economics, 1986, vol. 17, pp. 223–249.

Banz R. W. The relationship between return and market value of common stocks. Journal of Financial Economics, 1981, vol. 9, pp. 3–18.

Brown P., Keim D. B., Kleidon A. W., Marsh T. A. Stock return seasonalities and the tax-loss selling hypothesis: Analysis of the arguments and Australian evidence. Journal of Financial Economics, 1983, vol. 12, pp. 105−127.

Chan L. K. C., Karceski J., Lakonishok J. New paradigm or same old hype in equity investing? Financial Analysts Journal, 2000, vol. 56 (4), pp. 23–36.

Chui A. C. W., Wei K. C. J. Book-to-market, firm size, and the turn-of-the-year effect: Evidence from PacificBasin emerging markets. Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, 1998, vol. 6 (3-4), pp. 275–293.

Crain M. A. A literature review of the size effect. SSRN Working Paper. 2011. Available at: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1710076 (accessed: 10.04.2015).

de Groot C. G. M., Verschoor W. F. C. Further evidence on Asian stock return behavior. Emerging Markets Review, 2002, vol. 3 (2), pp. 179–193.

De Moor L., Sercu P. The smallest firm effect: An international study. Journal of International Money and Finance, 2013, vol. 32, pp. 129–155.

Dichev I. D. Is the risk of bankruptcy a systematic risk? The Journal of Finance, 1998, vol. 53 (3), pp. 1131–1147. Dimson E., Marsh P. Murphy’s law and market anomalies. Journal of Portfolio Management, 1999, vol. 25 (2), pp. 53–69.

Dimson E., Marsh P., Stuanton M. Investment style: Size, value and momentum. Credit Suisse Global Investment Returns Sourcebook 2011. Zurich, Credit Suisse Research Institute, 2011, pp. 41–54.

Drew M. E., Veeraraghavan M. A Closer Look at the Size and Value Premium in Emerging Markets: Evidence from the Kuala Lumpur Stock Exchange. Asian Economic Journal, 2003, vol. 16 (4), pp. 337–351.

Eleswarapu V. R., Reinganum M. R. The seasonal behavior of the liquidity premium in asset pricing. Journal of Financial Economics, 1993, vol. 34 (3), pp. 373–386.

Eraslan V. Fama and French Three-Factor Model: Evidence from Istanbul Stock Exchange. Business and Economics Research Journal, 2013, vol. l 4 (2), pp. 11–22.

Fama E. F., French K. R. The Cross-Section of Expected Stock Returns. The Journal of Finance, 1992, vol. 47 (2), pp. 427–465.

Fama E. F., French K. R. Size, value, and momentum in international stock returns. Journal of Financial Economics, 2012, vol. 105, pp. 457–472.

Garza-Gómez X., Hodoshima J., Kunimura M. Does size really matter in Japan? Financial Analysts Journal, 1998, vol. 54 (6), pp. 22–34.

Herrera M. J., Lockwood L. J. The Size Effect in the Mexican Stock Market. Journal of Banking and Finance, 1994, vol. 18 (4), p. 621−632.

Horowitz J. L., Loughran T., Savin N. E. The disappearing size effect. Research in Economics, 2000a, vol. 54 (1), pp. 83–100.

Horowitz J. L., Loughran T., Savin N. E. Three analyses of the firm size premium. Journal of Empirical Finance, 2000b, vol. 7 (2), pp. 143–153.

Keim D. B. Size-Related Anomalies and Stock Return Seasonality: Further Empirical Evidence. Journal of Financial Economics, 1983, vol. 12, pp. 13−32.

Khan F., Hassan A., Ali S. Size, Leverage and stock returns: evidence from Pakistan. International Journal of Academic Research, 2012, vol. 4 (1), pp. 24–32.

Kim Y. G., Chung K. H., Pyun C. S. Size, Price-Earnings Ratio, and Seasonal Anomalies in the Korean Stock Market. Pacific-Basin Capital Markets Research. North-Holand, Elsevier Science Publishers B. V., 1992, vol. 3, pp. 303−319.

Lakonishok J., Shapiro A. C. Systematic risk, total risk and size as determinants of stock market returns. Journal of Banking and Finance, 1986, vol. 10, pp. 115–132.

Li B., Boo Y. L., Ee M. S., Chen C. A re-examination of firm’s attributes and share returns: Evidence from the Chinese A-shares market. International Review of Financial Analysis, 2013, vol. 28, pp. 174–181.

Lischewski J., Voronkova S. Size, value and liquidity. Do They Really Matter on an Emerging Stock Market? Emerging Markets Review, 2012, vol. 13 (1), pp. 8–25.

Ma T., Shaw T. Y. The Relationships between Market Value, P/E Ratio, and Trading Volume and the Stock Return of Taiwan Stock Exchange. Pacific-Basin Capital Markets Research, 1990, vol. 1 (1), pp. 313–335.

Malkiel B., Jun D. The “value” effect and the market for Chinese stocks. Emerging Markets Review, 2009, vol. 10 (4), pp. 227–241.

Michou M., Mouselli S., Stark A. Fundamental analysis and the modelling of normal returns in the UK. SSRN Working Paper. 2010. Available at: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1607759 (accessed: 10.04.2015).

Mills T. C., Jordanov J. V. Lead-lag patterns between small and large size portfolios in the London stock exchange. Applied Financial Economics, 2000, vol. 11 (5), pp. 489–495.

Roll R. Style return differentials: Illusions, risk premiums, or investment opportunities. The Handbook of Equity Style Management: 3rd edn. Eds. T. D. Coggin and F. J. Fabozzi. Hoboken, John Wiley, 2003. 512 p.

Sehgal S., Tripathi V. Size effect in Indian stock market: some empirical evidence. The Journal of Business Perspective, 2005, vol. 9 (4), pp. 27–42.

Wang F., Xu Y. What determines Chinese stock returns. Financial Analysts Journal, 2004, vol. 60 (6), pp. 65–77.

Zhang X. F. Information uncertainty and stock returns. Journal of Finance, 2006, vol. 61 (1), pp. 105–136.