Меркантилизм как теория длительного периода

  • Глеб Владимирович Борисов Санкт-Петербургский государственный университет, Российская Федерация, 199034, Санкт-Петербург, Университетская наб., 7–9 https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0222-1248

Аннотация

The paper deals with the examination of critical objections to mercantilism. Criticism of mercantilism on the basis of the theory of specie flows treated in accordance with the formulation proposed by R. Cantillon and D. Hume is analyzed in detail. It is shown that the theory of specie flows is based on the shortrun assumptions upon the stability of technology and unit costs of production from period to period. A number of aspects of the mercantilist theory and policy concerning the longrun factors of the supply side that influence technology and unit costs is examined. Conclusions, stating that a) assumptions of the theory of specie flows and these of mercantilism are in conflict with each other and b) criticism of mercantilism based on the specie flows theory is incorrect, are made.

Ключевые слова:

история экономической мысли

Скачивания

Данные скачивания пока недоступны.

Биография автора

Глеб Владимирович Борисов, Санкт-Петербургский государственный университет, Российская Федерация, 199034, Санкт-Петербург, Университетская наб., 7–9

кандидат экономических наук, доцент

Литература

Литература на русском языке

Ман Т. Богатство Англии во внешней торговле // Меркантилизм / Под ред. И. С. Плотникова. Л., 1935. С. 156.

Петти В. Трактат о налогах и сборах. Гл. IV // Антология экономической классики. М., 1993. С. 33.

Смит А. Исследование о природе и причинах богатства народов. Кн. II. Гл. IV // Антология экономической классики. М., 1993. С. 377–379.

Юм Д. О торговом балансе // Малые произведения. М., 1996. С. 113–114.


References in Latin Alphabet

Allen W. R. Modern Defenders of Mercantilist Theory // History of Political Economy. 1970. Vol. 2. Issue 2. P. 382.

Ashley W. J. The Tory Origin of Free Trade Policy // Quarterly Journal of Economics. 1897. Vol. 11. Issue 4. P. 335–371.

Brewer A. Cantillon and Mercantilism // History of Political Economy. 1988. Vol. 20. Issue 3. P. 447–460.

Buzan B. Economic Structure and International Security: The Limits of the Liberal Case // International Organization. 1984. Vol. 38. Issue 4. P. 603.

Cannan E. A Review of Economic Theory. London, 1929.

Cantillon R. Essay on the Nature of Commerce in General. 1755. Pt. II. Ch. 10 (http://socserv.mcmaster.ca/econ/ugcm/3113/cantillon/index.html).

Central Planning and Neomercantilism. Princeton, 1964.

Coats A. W. The Interpretation of Mercantilist Economics: Some Historiographical Problems // History of Political Economy. 1973. Vol. 5. Issue 2. P. 485–495.

Ehrlich H. B. British Mercantilist Theories of Profit // American Journal of Economics and Sociology. 1955. Vol. 14. Issue 4. P. 377–386.

Ekelund R. E., Tollison R. D. Mercantilism as a Rent-Seeking Society. College Station, TX: Texas A&M University Press, 1982.

Gerschenkron A. History of Economic Doctrines and Economic History // American Economic Review. 1969. Vol. 59. Issue 2. P. 3.

Grampp W. D. The Liberal Elements in English Mercantilism // Quarterly Journal of Economics. 1952. Vol. 66. Issue 4. P. 465–501.

Heckscher E. F. Mercantilism. London, 1935.

Heinsohn G., Steiger O. Birth Control: The Political-Economic Rationale behind Jean Bodin’s Demonomanie // History of Political Economy. 1999. Vol. 31. Issue 3. P. 423–448.

Hinton R. W. K. The Mercantile System in the Time of Thomas Mun // The Economic History Review. New Series. 1955. Vol. 7. Issue 3. P. 277–290.

Landreth H. The Economic Thought of Bernard Mandeville // History of Political Economy. 1975. Vol. 7. Issue 2. P. 193–208.

Magnusson L. Mercantilism and «Reform» Mercantilism: The Rise of Economic Discourse in Sweden During the Eighteenth Century // History of Political Economy. 1987. Vol. 19. Issue 3. P. 415–433.

McGuire M. C., Ohta H. Implicit Mercantilism, Oligopoly, and Trade // Review of International Economics. 2005. Vol. 13. Issue 1. P. 165–184.

Muchmore L. A Note on Thomas Mun’s «England’s Treasure by Forraign Trade» // The Economic History Review. New Series. 1970. Vol. 23. Issue 3. P. 499–500.

Muchmore L. Gerrard de Malynes and Mercantile Economics // History of Political Economy. 1969. Vol. 1. Issue 2. P. 336–358.

Шумпетер Й. История экономического анализа: В 3 т. СПб., 2001. Т. 1. С. 479–482.

Nettels C. P. British Mercantilism and the Economic Development of the Thirteen Colonies // The Journal of Economic History. 1952. Vol. 12. Issue 2. P. 105–114.

Perrotta C. Is the Mercantilist Theory of the Favorable Balance of Trade Really Erroneous? // History of Political Economy. 1991.Vol. 23. Issue 2. P. 301–336.

Smith S. D. British Exports to Colonial North America and the Mercantilist Fallacy // Business History. 1995. Vol. 37. Issue 1. P. 59.

Wiles R. C. The Theory of Wages in Later English Mercantilism // The Economic History Review. 1968. Vol. 21. Issue 1. P. 113–126.

Wilson C. «Mercantilism»: Some Vicissitudes of an Idea // The Economic History Review. New Series. 1957. Vol. 10. Issue 2. P. 181–188.


Translation of references in Russian into English
Опубликован
2007-06-29
Как цитировать
Борисов, Г. В. (2007). Меркантилизм как теория длительного периода. Вестник Санкт-Петербургского университета. Экономика, (2), 068 - 078. извлечено от https://economicsjournal.spbu.ru/article/view/3786
Выпуск
Раздел
История развития экономики и экономической мысли