What is the import intensity of global aggregate demand?

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21638/11701/spbu05.2018.103

Abstract

While many studies look at the impact of trade on the supply side, notably through its impact on international vertical specialization and global supply chains, fewer papers examine how import penetration affects aggregate demand. The increased import intensity of aggregate demand has been a feature of the globalization process until the 2008-2009 financial crisis. Since then, the import/ trade intensity of some aggregate demand components seems to have behaved differently. Using input/ output tables for almost forty countries accounting for the bulk of global trade, this paper calculates the import intensity of aggregate demand over the period 1995-2014. The most pro-cyclical components of aggregate demand, i.e. investment, exports, and private consumption, are also found to be most import intensive; net government expenditures are less so. The most import intensive demand component of all is investment, which globally has an import content of 37 %. Unsurprisingly, investment is the only aggregate demand component that, by 2014, had not recovered to its pre-crisis level, a reason that might explain the relative slowdown of trade since the end of the financial crisis, for any given level of import intensity. Further, import intensity of investment seemed to have leveled off, if not fallen, in some emerging market economies. While the phenomenon is not long enough to be examined in detail, this is a change which might affect the pace of trade globalization.

Keywords:

international trade, investment, trade policy, business cycles, global supply chains

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
 

Author Biography

Marc Auboin, World Trade Organization (WTO), Centre William Rappard, Rue de Lausanne 154, CH-1211 Geneva 21, Switzerland

Marc Auboin is a Counsellor in the Economic Research and Statistics Division of the WTO, and a member of the WTO Task Force on the Finance Crisis and Trade. Previously he held several positions at the International Monetary Fund (IMF), was Deputy-Secretary General of the Monetary Committee of the European Union, worked for the French Treasury. Mr. Auboin holds a PhD in Economics from the Institut d'Etudes Politiques de Paris, and was a research fellow at the London School of Economics, and Yale University. He now lectures at the World Trade Institute in Switzerland and at CERDI in France, and used to lecture at the Universities of Paris-Sorbonne, Sciences-po Paris, Louvain-la-Neuve, and Oxford. He published pieces of research on trade and finance issues in the IMF's World Economic Outlook, and in WTO Discussion and Working Paper Series.

References

References

Alessandria G., Kaboski J. P., Midrigan V. The Great Trade Collapse of 2008–09: An Inventory Adjustment? IMF Economic Review, 2010, vol. 58 (2), pp. 254–294.

Amiti M., Weinstein D. E. Exports and Financial Shocks. Quarterly Journal of Economics. 2011, vol. 126 (4), pp. 1841–1877.

Auboin M., Engemann M. Testing the trade credit and trade link: evidence from data on export credit insurance. Review of World Economics, 2014, vol. 150 (4), pp. 715–743.

Bems R., Johnson R. C., Yi K. M. The great trade collapse. Annual Review of Economics, 2013, vol. 5 (1), pp. 375–400.

Bown C. P. Temporary Trade Barriers Database. 2016, June. World Bank, Washington. Available at: http://econ.worldbank.org/ttbd/ (accessed: 15.08.2017).

Bussière M., Callegari G., Ghironi F., Sestieri G., Yamano N. Estimating Trade Elasticities: Demand Composition and the Trade Collapse of 2008–2009. American Economic Journal: Macroeconomics, 2013, vol. 5 (3), pp. 118–151.

Bussière M., Ghironi F., Sestrieri G. Estimating trade elasticities: demand composition and the trade collapse of 2008–09, 2012. Vox column. Available at: http://voxeu.org/article/understanding-great-trade-collapse-2009 (accessed: 24.08.2017).

Cheung Y., Chinn M. D., Qian X. Are Chinese Trade Flows Different? Journal of International Money and Finance, 2012, vol. 31, pp. 2127–2146.

Chor D., Manova K. Off the cliff and back? Credit conditions and international trade during the global financial crisis. Journal of international economics, 2012, vol. 87 (1), pp. 117–133.

Christodoulopoulu S., Tkacevs O. Measuring the effectiveness of cost and price competitiveness in external rebalancing of euro area countries: what do alternative HCIs tell us? ECB Working Paper 17346, 2014. Available at: www.ecb.europa.eu (accessed: 24.08.2017).

Constantinescu C., Mattoo A., Ruta M. The Global Trade Slowdown: Cyclical or Structural? IMF Working Paper,

2015, no. 15/6. Available at: www.ecb.europa.eu (accessed: 24.08.2017).

Di Giovanni J., Levchenko A. A. Putting the parts together: trade, vertical linkages, and business cycle comovement. American Economic Journal: Macroeconomics, 2010, vol. 2 (2), pp. 95–124.

Eaton J., Kortum S., Neiman B., Romalis J. Trade and the Global Recession. American Economic Review, 2016, vol. 106 (11), pp. 3401–3438.

European Central Bank, 2016. Understanding the Weakness in Global Trade — What is the New Normal? ECB Occasional Paper No. 178. Available at: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2839779 (accessed: 08.08.2017).

Evenett S. J. What can be learned from crisis-era protectionism? An initial assessment. Business and Politics, 2009, vol. 11 (3), pp. 1–26.

Evenett S. J., Fritz J. The Tide Turns? Trade, Protectionism, and Slowing Global Growth — The 18th Global Trade Alert Report. CEPR Press, 2015. Available at: http://www.globaltradealert.org/reports/21 (accessed: 08.08.2017).

Freund C. L. The trade response to global downturns: historical evidence. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper Series, 2009. Available at: https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/handle/10986/4208 (accessed: 08.08.2017).

Giordano C., Zollino F. Shedding Light on Price and Non price competitiveness Determinants of Foreign Trade in the Four Largest euro area Countries. Review of International Economics, 2016, vol. 24 (3), pp. 604–634.

Haugh D., Kopoin A., Rusticelli E., Turner D., Dutu R., Cardiac Arrest or Dizzy Spell: Why is World Trade So Weak and What can Policy Do About It? OECD Economic Policy Papers, 2016, no. 18, Paris, OECD Publishing. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/5jlr2h45q532-en (accessed: 08.08.2017).

International Monetary Fund. Global Trade: What’s behind the Slowdown? World Economic Outlook, Chapter 2, Washington, October 2016. Available at: www.imf.org (accessed: 08.08.2017).

Levchenko A. A., Lewis L. T., Tesar L. L. The collapse of international trade during the 2008–09 crisis: in search of the smoking gun. IMF Economic review, 2010, vol. 58 (2), pp. 214–253.

The Great Trade Collapse: Causes, Consequences and Prospects, ed. Baldwin R. E. London, Centre for Economic Policy Research, 2009. Available at: http://www.voxeu.org/epubs/cepr-reports/great-tradecollapse-causes-consequences-and-prospects-anchor (accessed: 23.08.2017).

Wu Y. Growth, Expansion of Markets, and Income Elasticities in World Trade. IMF Working Paper, 2005, vol. 5011 (200), pp. 1–33.

Yi K. M. The collapse of global trade: the role of vertical specialization. The collapse of global trade, murky protectionism, and the crisis: Recommendations for the G20, eds. Baldwin R. E., Evenett S., 2009, pp. 45–48. Available at: http://www.voxeu.org/sites/default/files/Murky_Protectionism.pdf (accessed: 08.08.2017).

Published

2018-03-30

How to Cite

Auboin, M. (2018). What is the import intensity of global aggregate demand?. St Petersburg University Journal of Economic Studies, 34(1), 059–076. https://doi.org/10.21638/11701/spbu05.2018.103

Issue

Section

Global economy and international finance