Art Dealing as the Socioeconomic Phenomenon: Foreign Experience

Authors

  • Валерия Андреевна Колычева St. Petersburg State University, 7–9, Universitetskaya nab., St. Petersburg, 199034, Russian Federation https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0619-4523

Abstract

The most common association, arising from the art market and its operations is the auction transactions. Thus, alternative trading platforms — various galleries and salons, known under the general name of art dealers — have successfully been operating for a long time. A comprehensive study of this group of market agents is presented in the article for the fi rst time within the national science. Based on the works of foreign scientists describing the international art market, the primary principles of galleries and salons activity, such as taboo on lowering the peace of art price and the dictatorship of the master’s
reputation, are distinguished. A detailed analysis of various strategies for promoting “cultural” goods practiced by foreign dealers becomes a real basis for application by Russian art market agents. Additionally, this article attempts to establish evidential answers for specifi c questions of art market players, such as what kind of object is more expensive — big or small; what kind of author is more expensive — man or woman, etc. Finally, a direct comparison of pricing processes taking place in galleries and at auctions is made, for the purpose of critical conclusion — whether so wide demand for auctions is fair. Refs 25.

Keywords:

art market, works of art, pricing, dealers, auctions

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Валерия Андреевна Колычева, St. Petersburg State University, 7–9, Universitetskaya nab., St. Petersburg, 199034, Russian Federation

PhD in Economics, Assistant

References

Литература на русском языке

Вельтус О. Символические значения цены: конструирование ценности современного искусства в галереях Амстердама и Нью-Йорка // Экономическая социология. 2008. Т. 9, № 3. С. 33–59.

Жук К. Инвестиционный потенциал арт-рынка // ГD. 2011. № 05. С. 48–52.

Колычева В. А. Классификация факторов ценообразования на рынке произведений искусства // Экономический анализ: теория и практика. 2012. № 41 (296). С. 44–48.

Колычева В. А. Рынок произведений искусства: теоретико-экономический анализ. М.: Проспект, 2014. 136 с.

Мелихова Е. Л. Художественная галерея: торговля искусством? // Социс. 2000. № 4. С. 125–127.

Руководство по инвестированию на рынке предметов искусства / С. Скатерщиков, В. Кориневский, О. Яковенко и др. М.: Альпина Бизнес Букс, 2006. 224 с.


References in Latin Alphabet

Ashenfelter O. C., Graddy K. Sale Rates and Price Movements in Art Auctions // National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper. No. 16743. January 2011. P. 1–13.

Candela G., Scorcu A. E. In Search of Stylized Facts on Art Markets Prices: Evidence from the Secondary Market for Prints and Drawings in Italy // Journal of Cultural Economics. 2001. Vol. 25, N 3. P. 219–231.

Economics, Psychology and Social Dynamics of Consumer Bidding in Auctions / Cheema A., Popkowski Leszczyc P. T. L. et al. // Marketing Letters. 2005. Vol. 16, N 3. P. 401–413.

Coffman R. B. Art Investment and Asymmetrical Information // Journal of Cultural Economics. 1991. Vol. 15, N 2. P. 83–94.

Ekelund Jr. R. B., Ressler R. W., Watson J. K. The “Death-Effect” in Art Prices: A Demand-Side Exploration // Journal of Cultural Economics. 2000. Vol. 24, N 4. P. 283–300.

Hutter M., Knebel C., Pietzner G., Schäfer M. Two Games in Town: A Comparison of Dealer and Auction Prices in Contemporary Visual Arts Markets // Journal of Cultural Economics. 2007. Vol. 31, N 4. P. 247–261.

Mason С. The Art of the Steal: Inside the Sotheby’s-Christie’s Auction House Scandal. New York: Putnam Publishing Group, 2004. 406 p.

Pesando J. E., Shum P. M. The Law of One Price, Noise and “Irrational Exuberance”: The Auction Market for Picasso Prints // Journal of Cultural Economics. 2007. Vol. 31, N 4. P. 263–277.

Rengers M., Veldhuis O. Determinants of Prices for Contemporary Art in Dutch Galleries, 1992–1998 // Journal of Cultural Economics. 2002. Vol. 26, N 1. P. 1–28.

Santagata W. Institutional Anomalies in the Contemporary Art Market // Journal of Cultural Economics. 1995. Vol. 19, N 2. P. 187–197.

Scitovsky T. What’s Wrong with the Arts is What’s Wrong with Society // American Economic Review. 1972. Vol. LXII, N 2. P. 62–69.

Singer L. P. Phenomenology and Economics of Art Markets: An Art Historical Perspective // Journal of Cultural Economics. 1988. Vol. 12, N 1. P. 27–40.

Singer L., Lynch G. Public Choice in the Tertiary Art Market // Journal of Cultural Economics. 1994. Vol. 18, N 3. P. 199–216.

Schönfeld S., Reinstaller A. The Effects of Gallery and Artist Reputation on Prices in the Primary Market for Art: A Note // Journal of Cultural Economics. 2007. Vol. 31, N 2. P. 143–153.

Shubik M. Dealers in Art // Yale School of Management. Working Paper N 17. Series ES Economics / Strategy. 2001. Sept. P. 1–10.

Tanner S. C. The Changing Role of the Art Dealer // The ArtBook. 2010. Vol. 17, N 2. P. 52–53.

Throsby D. The Production and Consumption of the Arts: A View of Cultural Economics // Journal of Economic Literature. 1994. Vol. 32, N 1. P. 1–29.

Veldhuis O. Symbolic Meanings of Prices: Constructing the Value of Contemporary Art in Amsterdam and New York Galleries // Theory and Society. 2003. Vol. 32, N 2. P. 181–215.

Международная конфедерация ассоциаций арт-дилеров CINOA (Confederation Internationale des Negociants en Oeuvres d’Art) [Официальный сайт]. URL: http://www.cinoa.org/(accessed: 09.09.2014).


Translation of references in Russian into English

Published

2014-12-30

How to Cite

Колычева, В. А. (2014). Art Dealing as the Socioeconomic Phenomenon: Foreign Experience. St Petersburg University Journal of Economic Studies, (4), 103–116. Retrieved from https://economicsjournal.spbu.ru/article/view/2048

Issue

Section

Markets and Pricing