Instability of Employment: Theoretical Concept and Assessment of its Scale in Russia

Authors

Abstract

The article is devoted to the analysis of a new phenomenon in economic research in Russia — instability (precarization) of employment. The latter is considered to be a typical feature of modern employment relations which worsens quality of the economic growth. Instability of employment is seen as a condition for increasing the levels of uncertainty and risk on the labour market, and a job ceases to serve as a medium- and long-term source of life-planning for economically active population. This problem is in the forefront of Western European researches. There is a need to elaborate common approaches and criteria to study instability of employment, when comparing different countries. The economic approach proposed in the article develops the theoretical concept of employment instability. The approach is based on recognition and estimation of two objective features of employment instability: volatility and discreteness of employment income. Quantitative assessment of employment instability in Russia is introduced including its scale evaluation. 

Keywords:

employment instability, precarization of employment, employment, economic approach, contemporary labour relations, quantitative assessment of scale, labor market in Russia

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Олеся Васильевна Вередюк, St. Petersburg State University, 7–9, Universitetskaya nab., St. Petersburg, 199034, Russian Federation

PhD in Economics, Associate Professor

References

Литература на русском языке


References in Latin Alphabet

Доклад Генерального директора Международной организации труда (МОТ) «Изменение моделей и структур в сфере труда» на международной конференции труда. 95-я сессия. 2006. С. 25. URL: http://www.ilo.org/public/russia/standards/relm/ilc/index.htm (дата обращения: 07.09.2012).

ILO. Global Employment Trends 2012. Preventing a deeper jobs crisis. Geneva, 2012.

Prekarisierung und Flexibilisierung (Precarity and Flexibilisation). Rolf-Dieter Hepp. Westfalisches Dampfboot, 2012. 386 p.

URL: http://www.dict.org/bin/Dict (дата обращения: 10.08.2012).

Frade C., Darmon I. New Modes of Business Organization and Precarious Employment: Towards the Recommodification of Labour // Journal of European Social Policy. 2005. Vol. 15, N. 2. P. 107–121.

Guest D. E., Isaksson K., De Witte H. Employment Contracts, Psychological Contracts and Employee Well-Being. Individual and Organizational Outcomes of Employment Contracts. Oxford University Press, 2010. 315 p.

Olmedo C., Murray M. J. Th e Formalization of Informal / Precarious Labor in Contemporary Argentina // International Sociology. 2002. Vol. 17(3). P. 421–443.

Di Nicola P. Precarity, Paper presented to the 10th Conference of European Sociological Association «Social relations in turbulent times». Geneva, 2011. 7–10 September. URL: www.dinicola.it/ESA2011/paper.pdf (дата обращения: 15.09.2012).

Бобков В. Н., Черных Е. А., Алиев У. Т., Курильченко Е. И. Неустойчивость занятости: негативные стороны современных социально-трудовых отношений // Уровень жизни населения регионов России. 2011. № 5. С. 13–14.

Bobkov V., Chernykh E., Aliev U. Precarity in Russia and Labour and Employment Markets Transformation Precarity — More than a Challenge of Social Security Or: Cynicism of EU’s Concept of Economic Freedom / eds Herrmann P., Kalayciogli S. Europaischer Hochschulverlag GmbH and Co. Bremen, 2011. P. 160–180.

Lindenboim J. The Precariousness of Argentine Labor Relations in the 1990s // Latin American Perspectives. 2004. Is. 137. Vol. 31, N. 4. P. 21–31.

Труд и занятость в России: стат. сб. Т. 78. M., 2011.

Bollé P. The Future of Work, Employment and Social Protection (The Annecy Symposium, January 2001) // International Labour Review. 2001. Vol. 140, N 4. P. 453–474.


Translation of references in Russian into English

Doklad General’nogo direktora Mezhdunarodnoi organizatsii truda (MOT) “Izmenenie modelei i struktur v sfere truda” na mezhdunarodnoi konferentsii truda. 95-ia sessiia (Director-General of the International Labour Organization (ILO), “Changing patterns in the world of work” at the International Labour Conference. 95th). 2006, p.25. URL: http://www.ilo.org/public/russia/standards/relm/ilc/index.htm (accessed 07.09.2012).

ILO. Global Employment Trends 2012. Preventing a deeper jobs crisis. Geneva, 2012.

Prekarisierung und Flexibilisierung (Precarity and Flexibilisation). Rolf-Dieter Hepp. Westfalisches Dampfboot, 2012. 386 p.

URL: http://www.dict.org/bin/Dict (accessed 10.08.2012).

Frade C., Darmon I. Journal of European Social Policy. 2005. Vol.15, N 2, pp.107–121.

Guest D.E., Isaksson K., De Witte H. Employment Contracts, Psychological Contracts and Employee Well-Being. Individual and Organizational Outcomes of Employment Contracts. Oxford University Press, 2010. 315 p.

Olmedo C., Murray M.J. International Sociology. 2002. Vol.17(3), pp.421–443.

Di Nicola P. Precarity, Paper presented to the 10th Conference of European Sociological Association “Social relations in turbulent times”. Geneva, 2011. 7–10 September. URL: www.dinicola.it/ESA2011/paper.pdf (accessed 15.09.2012).

Bobkov V.N., Chernykh E.A., Aliev U.T., Kuril’chenko E.I. Uroven’ zhizni naseleniia regionov Rossii. 2011. N 5, pp.13–14.

Bobkov V., Chernykh E., Aliev U. Precarity in Russia and Labour and Employment Markets Transformation Precarity — More than a Challenge of Social Security Or: Cynicism of EU’s Concept of Economic Freedom. Eds Herrmann P., Kalayciogli S.Europaischer Hochschulverlag GmbH and Co. Bremen, 2011, pp.160–180.

Lindenboim J. Latin American Perspectives. 2004. Is. 137. Vol.31, N 4, pp.21–31.

Trud i zaniatost’ v Rossii (Labor and Employment in Russia): stat. sb. Vol.78. Moscow, 2011.

Bollé P. International Labour Review. 2001. Vol.140, N 4, pp.453–474.

Published

2013-03-29

How to Cite

Вередюк, О. В. (2013). Instability of Employment: Theoretical Concept and Assessment of its Scale in Russia. St Petersburg University Journal of Economic Studies, (1), 025–032. Retrieved from https://economicsjournal.spbu.ru/article/view/2058

Issue

Section

Economic theory in historical development