Bühlmann and Bühlmann–Straub Credibility Models with an Alternative Dependence Structure

Authors

  • Андрей Алексеевич Кудрявцев St. Petersburg State University, 7–9, Universitetskaya nab., St. Petersburg, 199034, Russian Federation https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7722-8044

Abstract

The traditional approach to the Bьhlmann and Bьhlmann–Straub models is based on a special type of dependence — known as the conditional independence. Although there have been some attempts to generalise these models, it is still difficult to understand what general conditions should be met for existence of solutions in the traditional form of the credibility estimator. Different forms of past experience that influence the predictor are discussed. Two different sets of assumptions regarding the alternative dependence structure and the type of estimator are discussed in this paper. For both approaches, the Bьhlmann and Bьhlmann–Straub models are specific cases.

Keywords:

quadratic loss function, variance–covariance matrix, uniform dependence, mechanism for the influence of past experience (data) on the predictor, best linear Bayes estimator

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Андрей Алексеевич Кудрявцев, St. Petersburg State University, 7–9, Universitetskaya nab., St. Petersburg, 199034, Russian Federation

кандидат экономических наук, доцент

References

Литература на русском языке

Кудрявцев А. А. Лекции по оценке премий для краткосрочных видов страхования. Часть 3. Учет качества данных. СПб.: Европейский ун-т в С.-Петербурге, 2008.


References in Latin Alphabet

Bühlmann H. Experience rating and credibility // ASTIN Bulletin. 1967. Vol. 4. N 3. P. 199–207.

Bühlmann H., Gisler A. A course in credibility theory and its applications. Berlin at al.: Springer, 2005.

Bühlmann H., Straub E. Glaubwürdigkeit für Schadensätze // Mitteilungen der Vereinigung schweizerischer Versicherungsmathematiker. 1970. Vol. 70. P. 111–133.

Denuit M. et al. Actuarial theory for dependent risks: measures, orders and models. New York: Wiley, 2005.

Frees E. W., Wang P. Copula credibility for aggregate loss models // Insurance: Mathematics and Economics. 2006. Vol. 38. N 2. P. 360–373.

Frees E. W., Wang P. Credibility using copulas // North American Actuarial Journal. 2005. Vol. 9. N 2. P. 31–48.

Kaas R. et al. Modern actuarial risk theory — using R: 2nd ed. Berlin: Springer, 2008.

Klugman S. A., Panjer H. H., Willmot G. E. Loss models: from data to decisions: 3rd ed. New York: Wiley, 2008.

Norberg R. Credibility Theory // Encyclopedia of actuarial science. Vol. 1. Chichester, UK: Wiley, 2004. P. 398–406.

Purcaru O., Denuit M. Dependence in dynamic claims frequency credibility models // ASTIN Bulletin. 2003. Vol. 33. N 1. P. 23–40.

Wen L.-M., Wang W., Yu X.-L. Credibility models with error uniform dependence // Journal of East China Normal University (Natural Science). 2009. Vol. 5. P. 118–137.


Translation of references in Russian into English

Published

2010-12-30

How to Cite

Кудрявцев, А. А. (2010). Bühlmann and Bühlmann–Straub Credibility Models with an Alternative Dependence Structure. St Petersburg University Journal of Economic Studies, (4), 076–087. Retrieved from https://economicsjournal.spbu.ru/article/view/3143

Issue

Section

Finance, Credit, Insurance